You cant believe all what you read in some magazines today can you.
Printable View
You cant believe all what you read in some magazines today can you.
Fairly broad opening statement. More to come?
Cant believe everything you read on this forum either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow......that was interesting..
I am afraid I will have to get out the enigma machine out again and do a course in cryptololgy to understand this tread, and as most of us here know, there are lies, damm lies and then the printed word, the interweb is full of bullshit and porn, but the truth is out there, now beam me up Scotty!
Roger
The answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything is ... 42
AND............
A half
Now Boys, don't be unkind. I THINK the answer CUSTAXIE was looking for here was.........wait for it.......NO.
Do I detect a little levity creeping into the Roaring season......... LoL...
levity, is that when you throw the car at the corner?
No no, that's poverty........the state you are in after you have repaired the damage.
When clearing up fathers estate I found a magazine, it still had six rounds in it too.
Perhaps he is referring to the graffiti on the walls of the Magazines on Godley Head?
Oldfart, I thought you would be dragging us all back into line for straying from the subject of the thread..........what subject?
Please refer to post #1.
This has got me beat. I used to be able to translate Jims compositions relatively easily..........but !!!!!
Jim, perhaps you could help us out here as we seem to be floundering around in the dark.
I certainly don't believe everything I read in magazines. I once read that there were articles written in Playboy Magazine, but I've never been able to find one!
Penthouse Magazine also once made the same erroneous claim. Again, after many years of looking, I've never managed to find a single one.
John, you need to progress beyond the centrefold to find them
We must thank CUSTAXIE50 for starting this thread ... it's both insightful and entertaining!
Got called away as i was about to put this story up, by a phone call from those out there who deal with cancer so it was a long day ,and was not in the mood at what i see has been put up here.
Ah well, there you go. I knew we would get shot down sooner or later. Was fun while it lasted.......
Just like to wish everyone a happy Christmas, and maybe we will catch at a meeting some time soon.
No worries CUSTAXIE50 - this thread has been entertaining.
And it achieved a new record ... 23 posts about absolutely nothing!!!
CUSTAXIE50- so what was in the mag that prompted you to start this thread, can you tell us please?
May have been cut short, but even so an excellent, pertinent observation and a worthy post..
Forums are cluttered with invalid advice, provided by so called experts, who read only from magazines and even then only the advertisements. These numb skulls always claim to know the absolute facts, and the like minded agree with them and add to the ongoing fantasies. LOL
“Pay special attention to evidence that contradicts your beliefs”
Dont know if you have nz classic car march 2010,if you do have it did you read the story on page 63 put up by Helen and Denis Le Cren on the re birth of the Custaxie.Dont know where they got that story from do you,also Don Anderson from classic driver has got it wrong a number of times also,dont they do there home work first.
Dont have that issue, but...
OK- try this...
Classic Driver Aug/Sept 2012 Issue 44, page 12-
Allan Dick states Norm Shepherd bought the engineless Custaxie shortly after the series and fitted a side valve motor, seats, head and taillamps and used it on the road.
Des Hammill states it had a Y-block., also Gen Walmesley knows a lot more-mate of Kevin and Croydon.
How accurate are these 2 would you say,please?
As I suspect that most of us don't have that article, are you able to put it up for us to read. And I am NOT taking the piss when I say that you seem to be very close to the original car, so perhaps you might post the corrections you believe to be more correct. In this way we will get what you think is correct for future reference.
Very accurate John. I worked with Norm and Engine Rebuilders in Union Street Auckland when he had it as a road car with the flat head V8 in it....I may have already said this on another thread but we used to howl around Queen Street in it......I remember hanging on to the roll cage in the back...(only had two front seats)... as we drew straws who would ride in the front. Great days........I had a 34' Ford flathead at the time and used to "Smoke " the MCConnachie brothers off until they put a 272 Y block into their '34. ..........AND yes the Custaxie then got a Y block 272 (original type of motor the car came out with from factory...) and Cooza Thompson ..(Croydens brother dragged it down at Wiri...) Don't know what happened to it after that because Cooza fell off the scene (after 44 gallon drums of peanut oil went missing and he took the fall....the story goes..)... But Robbie did tell me it ended up at the tip buried along with all sorts of other good stuff in those days. Damn shame really. But YES I can confirm AD does write fact in this story. See ya soon....Kindest regards Tony Rutherford. P.S. Custaxie...I will see if I can find that mag you speak of mate. Hate shoddy reporting myself but I guess by the time some of these reporters get their knowledge it's better than the original we started! Merry Christmas folk.
Shepherd according to post #30 above
#30 - Norm Shepherd bought the engineless Custaxie
I gather we are not going to get to see the article which started this thread with corrections?
Right Custaxie 50, I went upstairs & found the article in question in that issue of classic car, Sooo what part of the article is not correct?... & before anyone else ask's, no I dont have a scanner:)
[QUOTE=Jac Mac;36484]Right Custaxie 50, I went upstairs & found the article in question in that issue of classic car, Sooo what part of the article is not correct?... & before anyone else ask's, no I dont have a scanner:)[/QUOTE Robbie getting his hands on custaxie 1 again.